Anonymity for shareholders is a significant consideration when choosing the legal form of a company in Switzerland. The degree of privacy provided to the owners of Aktiengesellschaft (AG) and Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH) varies, influencing the decision based on the desired level of public exposure shareholders are willing to accept.
1. Shareholder Anonymity in AG: - In an AG, shareholders' anonymity can be relatively high, especially if shares are bearer shares. Bearer shares do not record the owner's name and are simply held by the person who possesses the physical share certificate. However, recent regulatory changes in Switzerland aimed at increasing transparency in financial activities mean that bearer shares are now largely restricted. Effective from November 2019, existing bearer shares are only permitted if the company is listed on a stock exchange or if the shares are issued as book-entry securities. All bearer shareholders must register with the company, and the company must keep a register of owners.
- Despite these changes, the identities of AG shareholders do not need to be publicly disclosed unless the shares are registered, in which case the shareholder's name and address are recorded in the company's register of shares. This register is not publicly accessible but must be available to tax authorities and certain regulatory agencies upon request.
2. Shareholder Anonymity in GmbH: - GmbH offers greater anonymity compared to AG. In a GmbH, the details of the shareholders are recorded in a register that must be filed with the commercial register when the company is established and whenever there are changes in ownership. Although this register includes names and addresses of all the owners and is a matter of public record, it does not disclose the extent of individual holdings or the amount of capital each member has contributed.
- Share transfers in GmbH are also subject to restrictions; they require a public deed and the approval of other shareholders, thus providing an additional layer of privacy regarding transaction details between shareholders.
Implications for Business Owners: - The choice between AG and GmbH may depend on the level of anonymity shareholders desire. High-profile individuals or investors who prefer privacy might opt for GmbH due to the lower level of public disclosure requirements. In contrast, businesses seeking to raise capital through public markets might find AG more suitable despite the reduced privacy.
- Regulatory compliance is also a key factor; both AG and GmbH must adhere to Switzerland's stringent anti-money laundering regulations. These include the obligation to identify beneficial owners and disclose this information to the Money Laundering Reporting Office of Switzerland (MROS) when certain thresholds are met.
Navigating Swiss Legal Requirements: - The Swiss legal environment encourages transparency while still allowing some level of privacy for business owners. It's crucial for potential business owners to understand these nuances as they can have implications for personal privacy, legal compliance, and the operational strategy of the business.
Overall, while both AG and GmbH offer features that protect shareholder identity to some degree, GmbH generally provides a higher level of anonymity. However, the decision should align with other strategic business goals, considering factors such as the need for capital, the scale of operations, and the intended public or private nature of the company.